October,
2007, Issue
In
This Issue
Risk-Based Cleanup Rules
Approved
Customer Service Seminars
Tri-State Equipment Show
Why I'm a Member with Doo Choi
DLI/IFI's First Woman President
Priceless Publicity
NCDENR Receives Greenfields Award
NCALC's New Mentoring Program
Changes to the Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act
Fall Board & Committee Meetings
Join DLI/NCALC Now & Save Money
DLI Board Changes
Legal Briefs Social Security "No Match" Letters
Ways NCALC Has Saved You Money
Clean '07 Solvent Options Handout
Return to Carolina Clean Index
Return
to NCALC Homepage
Risk-Based Cleanup Rules
Approved
The linch-pin of the
Dry-cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program is now in place.
The Risk Based Cleanup Rules received final approval from the
Rules Review Commission (RRC) last week and will be effective
as of October 1, 2007. The Rules establish the mechanism for
applying the site specific cleanup standards to sites in the
program to determine the acceptable level(s) of contamination
that may be left in the soil and ground water. These calculations
will tell the DSCA Program how clean is clean enough and authorize
them to issue No Further Action (NFA"s) Letters on sites
that meet the Risk Based Cleanup Standards.
Since the DSCA Program has collected
extensive information on many of the sites in the Program and
some sites meet the site specific cleanup standards, some No
Further Action Letters should be issued before year end and active
remediation can begin on other sites in the Program.
Chris Is Coming. Are You?
Chris Allsbrooks, DLI (formerly IFI)'s star of the stage, TV,
Training Video's, DVD's and the classroom is bringing her Customer
Service & Problem Garment Class "Your Profits Begin
at the Front Counter" to North Carolina for a four stop
road show October 21-24. One of the most sought after speakers
in the industry, Chris combines humor with enthusiasm in her
dynamic interactive sessions to make her points stay with participants
when they return to work. Chris's "ragbag" contains
examples of the most recent manufactures disasters as well as
examples of persistent "problems waiting to happen."
A veteran of the DLI Analysis lab, who worked as a Customer Service
Representative at a local drycleaners while in college, Chris
has appeared on local and national TV as a spokesperson for DLI
and the Fabricare Foundation. Her customer Service Seminars and
classes have received rave reviews in recent appearances in Pennsylvania,
South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Texas, California, and at Clean
07.
Dooyoung Choi, Galaxy Cleaners,
Cary
Every one of us is motivated by personal and business/professional
needs. Probably my needs are not that much different than yours.
Let's review a basic sociology theory. Maslow's Hierarchy describes
the needs of persons in 5 basic steps.
1. Biological and Physiological
- air, food, drink, shelter, warmth, sleep, etc.
2. Safety - protection from elements, security, order, law, limits,
stability, etc.
3. Belongingness and Love - work group, family, affection, relationships,
etc.
4. Esteem - self-esteem, achievement, mastery, independence,
status, dominance, prestige, managerial responsibility, etc.
5. Self-Actualization - realizing personal potential, self-fulfillment,
seeking personal growth and peak experiences.
Once needs 1 and 2 are met what we seek as an individual is a
sense of belonging ( 3 ) to a group or circle of friends. NCALC
provides professional belonging for Dry Cleaners such as myself.
I joined the organization as a newbie. In the beginning more
often than not I was in panic mode as machines broke down constantly
and I needed my customer's orders filled but did not know who
to call for support (emotional and mechanical.) Being part of
the NCALC organization allowed me to meet a group of great people
who are willing to help (service contacts, spare parts, lending
expertise/experience ) in times of need.
What do I get for my money? We
all asked this question when we wrote our membership check. I
joined IFI/DLI and NCALC at the same time. I have used the IFI
reference library and articles (from IFI/DLI monthly) to help
customers get refunds/replacements on defective articles from
retailers or manufacturers on numerous occasions. This is a HUGE
customer service benefit and advantage. We as well as our customers
get an education and the satisfaction of knowing that we have
averted what could have been a bad situation. This results in
increased customer confidence and great PR for me as a business
owner ( 4), not to mention keeping damages/losses to a minimum!
Also the recent passing of the amendments to the DSCA (passage
facilitated with the help of NCALC) provides me with not only
piece of mind but a potential financial solution (reduction in
deductible and co-pay) for potential clean up needs.
There are things we can accomplish
as an individual, but as a group we can accomplish a lot more.
This is why I am a member.
As for the self actualization
(5), let me know if you get there and what it feels like.
Barbara Harvey Installed as
First Woman President of DLI
The Drycleaning & Laundry Institute (formerly IFI) installed
its first president at Clean '07 in Las Vegas. Barbara Harvey,
owner of Fabricare by Fran in Severna Park, Maryland, will serve
as DLI President for the 2007-2008 term. She previously served
as President-Elect, Treasurer, and District 2 Director, and becomes
the first woman to hold the Institute's highest leadership post.
Over the years Harvey has been
an active volunteer leader in several cleaning and laundry associations,
serving as president of the MidAtlantic Association of Cleaners
and the Coin Laundry Association of Maryland, for example.
Despite her impressive credentials, Harvey-known affectionately
as "Bobbie" among her peers-remains humble to the end.
"I haven't gone very far in life," she joked. "I
live in the same house I was born in, and I'm working the only
job I ever had." It's true, Harvey worked in the plant with
her parents Francis and Theo Sadler until she took the reigns
in 1989. Her parents launched Fabricare by Fran in 1951 as a
route service, steadily building it into a full-service drycleaner
with a coin laundry facility. The coin laundry side was sold
in 2005.
Most recently, Harvey chaired
the committee to change the International Fabricare Institute's
name to the Drycleaning & Laundry Institute. "Basically,
most consumers did not understand what IFI means," she said.
"Inside the industry, we all know what 'fabricare' means,
but the name IFI did not represent what we do very well to the
general public. We wanted to simplify the name."
I feel very confident that I
have handed over the association to a very competent person,"
said Steve Poulos, the outgoing president and new DLI chairman.
"Bobbie has demonstrated her competency time and again at
board meetings and industry functions. I'm very comfortable knowing
that she's the new president."
Gary Dawson served as 2006-2007
Chairman and worked extensively with Harvey on the Board of Directors
and its Executive Committee. "Bobbie's been very involved
in the industry for a very long time," Dawson said. "The
fact that she is the first lady to become president of the association
is testament to her drive and desire to promote the best interests
of the industry. She is a very dedicated volunteer who has given
many, many hours of her time to help advance the cleaning industry."
Dawson expressed his belief that
Harvey easily fits the mold of a DLI president. "It takes
some special qualities to do that job. It's an all-volunteer
role, and there are a lot of meetings to attend and a lot of
opportunities to represent the Institute. Bobbie is a small-plant
operator who is a very levelheaded, down-to-earth person. I'm
sure she'll keep the association and the industry close to her
heart like she always has."
You Can't Buy Publicity Like
This
This Letter to the Editor appeared
in the Charlotte Observer.
Bonding across faiths could happen
every day
Visits to other faith groups, talks and presentations, question-and-answer
sessions and conversations often seem the most prevalent form
of interfaith dialogue. There is no doubt: Such friendly and
hopeful sessions are critical to understanding one another more
fully.
But they are, in a way, a setup.
Someone from another tradition is coming to speak to us; we are
on our best behavior; and our questions and responses are, in
the main, polite.
It makes me wonder sometimes.
What if we were all these things in daily life? Couldn't we see
all the opportunities before us for connecting intelligently
with people of other faiths and ethnicities?
Recently, I went into my favorite
cleaner's. (I confess I like the idea of supporting homegrown
businesses.) For years, Martin Young has worked on the few items
of clothing that really matter to me. There's that dress with
the beads on it that I bought for my younger brother's wedding
17 years ago.
Recently I gave the lace from
my wedding dress to Young, sure that he could do whatever was
needed for me to sew it onto a different dress. Young, a Christian,
cleans religious clothing, like the small hats my family wears
at services. And he takes care of the mantles that go around
our congregation's Torah, the scroll with the handwritten text
of the first five books of Moses.
Every now and again, Mr. Young
and I discuss this or that religious idea, or a text common to
our traditions. Sometimes we just chat about life in general.
Recently, I gave Mr. Young a
rich, red, velvety Torah mantle I had sewn myself. He asked me
whether I had washed the cloth before sewing. That's a rule as
old as dressmaking. Still, I'd forgotten to follow it.
So, no, I hadn't done that, I
admitted, a bit shamefaced.
"I'll do what I can,"
he said.
"I know," I responded.
I came back a week later. When
I saw the mantle, I could hardly believe it. The spots were gone,
the cloth looked like new, and even the nap was brushed all in
one direction.
"What do I owe you?"
I asked.
"Nothing," Mr. Young
said.
I protested, but to no avail.
"Don't steal my blessing now," he warned me. In the
end, I found a way to give a blessing in return.
I've been thinking about our
exchange ever since. Two human beings were connecting with each
other. Neither of us needed a special presentation, an arranged
meeting or a learned speaker to remind us to act generously toward
one another. Martin Young and his family greet me with enthusiasm
every time I walk in to their store. I go there with that same
joy.
Interfaith dialogue happens most
beautifully when there's no setup, when it emerges out of the
things we need most in life: respect and understanding, sensitivity
and goodwill.
It's nice to find those things
home-grown.
BARBARA THIEDE
NCDENR Receives International
Award for 2001 Alternatives Study
The North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural resources received the International
Drycleaning & Laundry Institute's 2007 Green Fields Award
in recognition of the lasting environmental contributions of
their 2001 Study Group Report on ALTERNATIVES TO THE PREDOMINANT
DRY CLEANING PROCESSES. The study compared the environmental
and public health impacts of predominant and alternative solvents,
processes and equipment; their ability to clean natural and synthetic
fibers and fabrics without damage; and the financial impact of
conversion to and utilization of alternate solvents. The study
concluded that the drycleaning industry has done an excellent
job in reducing its environmental footprint and that further
improvement should be encouraged rather than required by statue.
The award was presented to NCDENR
Secretary Williams G. Ross, Jr by Mack Davis, DLI District 2
Director. Also in attendance were Gary Hunt, Director, Division
of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance, whose division
produced the Study, Chris Edwards, VP of Governmental Affairs
& Sto Fox, Executive Director of the North Carolina Association
of Launderers and Cleaners, and Dr. Manfred Wentz, President
of Textile Care International in Apex and recipient of the Green
Fields Award in 2001.
In presenting the award Mack
Davis thanked Secretary Ross for the "fair and even-handed
way the department had conducted the study" and the excellent
working relationship that the North Carolina Association enjoys
with the departments Small Business Ombudsman, Small Business
Environmental Assistance Program and Dry-cleaning Solvent Cleanup
Act Program.
NCALC's New Mentoring Program
Do you sometime feel like Robinson Crusoe, all alone with no
one to talk to? As the old saying goes it gets lonely at the
top. Small business owners have few people to talk too who really
understand the challenges we face each and everyday. You're the
owner, plant manager, customer service manager, chief mechanic,
cleaner/spotter, bookkeeper, etc etc. Unlike your buddy in the
corporate world you are responsible for all the day to day activities
of your operation and finance, marketing, and long range planning.
Sometimes it is not so great to be your own boss. Your spouse,
golf buddies, banker, accountant, lodge brothers and neighbors
don't really understand the complexity of your job nor have the
experience or knowledge to provide you with advice & counsel
across the broad spectrum of your responsibilities. NO ONE DOES
EXCEPT ANOTHER DRYCLEANER.
This is why NCALC is creating
a Mentorship Program for members who would like to talk business
with someone who is or has walked in their shoes i.e. a current
or former plant owner/operator. The plan is simple.
We are currently seeking active
or retired members who are willing to volunteer some time to
act as a sounding board and share their knowledge and experience
with others.
Members who are considering entering
or actively engaged in the cleaning business can request a Mentor.
Members requesting a Mentor will
be matched with a volunteer who is not a competitor and has experience
in a similar size operation.
The member requesting the mentor
and/or the mentor can reject the other and are free to terminate
the relationship at anytime. Unless otherwise terminated by either
party, the initial arrangement is for six months and can be renewed
twice for a total of eighteen months by mutual agreement.
There is no cost to the individual
being mentored for the mentor's time and knowledge, experience
or advice. However, if extensive travel and lodging are required,
reimbursement of the mentors out of pocket expenses may be appropriate.
Mentors will receive no compensation
for their services.
Both parties must sign a wavier
holding each other and NCALC harmless.
ALL MEMBERS OR RETIRED FORMER
MEMBERS INTERESTED IN MENTORING A NEW OR SMALL MEMBER ARE ASKED
TO CONTACT MARTIN YOUNG AT 704-786-3011.
ANY MEMBER INTERESTED IN HAVING
A MENTOR IS ASKED TO CONTACT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STO FOX AT 336-549-5486.
Changes to the Dry-Cleaning
Solvent Cleanup Act
by Dr. John Powers
Head of the Special Remediation Branch of the Superfund Section
of the Waste Management Divvision, NCDENR
On August 31, Governor Easley
signed into law Senate Bill 1362 which made significant changes
to the Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA). The DSCA Program
hopes that these changes will improve program implementation
and also encourage more dry cleaner owners, operators and property
owners to bring their contaminated sites into the program. If
you have any questions about these changes and how they may affect
you, please do not hesitate to contact me or DSCA Program staff
at (919) 508-8400.
Cleanup Program Application Fee
Effective September 1, 2007, each person who petitions for certification
of a facility or abandoned site into the cleanup program must
pay an application fee of $1,000.
Financial Responsibility Changes
S.B. 1362 significantly modified the financial contributions
that are required from petitioners participating in the cleanup
program. Deductibles have been eliminated and are replaced by
a fixed co-pay percentage applied to site costs between $0 and
$1 million. For active facilities with less than 5 full-time
equivalent employees, petitioners would have to pay 1% of assessment
and remediation costs between $0 and $1 million. For active facilities
with 5-9 full-time equivalent employees and for abandoned facility
sites, the co-pay is 1.5%. For active facilities with 10 or more
full-time equivalent employees and for wholesale distribution
facilities, the co-pay is 2%. The following table demonstrates
what the petitioners' obligations would have been under the previous
financial system compared to the new system for a site that costs
$300,000 to clean up.

The table clearly illustrates
the lower contributions required from petitioners under the new
system. Instead of paying an up-front deductible ranging from
$5,000 to $25,000, petitioners would be billed annually the new
co-pay percentage of costs that the program has incurred.
The financial obligations of
petitioners for sites that entered the program prior to September
1 will also be converted to the new system. Payments made by
petitioners prior to the change will be credited toward the new
obligations. For example, if a petitioner paid the $5,000 deductible
for a small site, the program would not bill that petitioner
again unless total site costs exceeded $500,000. Petitioners
for abandoned sites that paid the $25,000 deductible have satisfied
all financial obligations and would not be billed again. S.B.
1362 does not allow for reimbursement of previously-incurred
costs that exceed the new obligations.
Program Eligibility and MMP Compliance
A dry cleaner owner or operator under the old law would have
been denied access to the cleanup program if the facility was
out of compliance with the MMPs at the time contamination was
discovered. S.B. 1362 changed that, now allowing the DSCA Program
to use discretion when determining if the noncompliance was significant
enough to warrant denial of site eligibility.
Definition of "Dry-cleaning
Solvent"
The introduction of alternative solvents to the dry-cleaning
industry in recent years led to the need to clarify the definition
of "dry-cleaning solvent" so that it would be clear
which solvents would be subject to DSCA and the Minimum Management
Practices (MMPs) for operating facilities. S.B. 1362 modified
the definition so that it applied strictly to "any hydrocarbon
or halogenated hydrocarbon used as a solvent in a dry-cleaning
operation or the degradation products from these solvents."
The bill also added new definitions that define "halogenated
hydrocarbon" and "hydrocarbon." These additions
were used to also modify the solvent tax law by clarifying that
the $10.00 per gallon tax applies to halogenated hydrocarbon-based
solvents and the $1.35 tax applies to hydrocarbon-based solvents.
Solvents subject to DSCA regulation
and the $10.00 per gallon tax include perchloroethylene, F-1,1,3
or 1,1,1 trichloroethane, and n-propyl bromide. Solvents subject
to DSCA and the $1.35 per gallon tax include the various petroleum
solvents such as Stoddard and Quick Dry 105F as well as the high-flash
hydrocarbons including DF-2000 and EcoSolv. Solvents not subject
to DSCA and for which no solvent tax is charged include liquid
CO2, propylene glycol ether and methyl siloxane.
Allowance to Investigate Possible
Dry-Cleaning Contamination Sites
S.B. 1362 allows the DSCA Program to utilize up to one percent
of the DSCA Fund balance for the investigation of sites that
appear to be contaminated by dry-cleaning solvents. The purpose
of this investigation is to determine if the contamination originated
from a dry-cleaning facility (either active or abandoned).
If a facility is identified,
the potentially responsible party (PRP) will be notified and
given the opportunity to enter into the cleanup program. As a
condition for acceptance into the program, the PRP will be required
to accept in writing the responsibility of costs incurred to
perform the investigation. These costs will then be credited
toward the petitioner's financial responsibility requirements
for the site. If the PRP decides not to petition, the DSCA Program
may request the Attorney General to commence a civil action against
the PRP to recover the investigation costs. An example of when
an investigation under this provision could be performed is when
perchloroethylene is found in a water-supply well and one or
more dry-cleaning facilities are located nearby.
Annual Site Expenditures
S.B. 1362 increased the amount that DSCA can spend on a site
from $200,000 to $500,000 per year. If a site poses an imminent
hazard, the amount increases from $400,000 under the old law
to $1 million.
Clarification - All Work Performed
by State-hired Contractors
Language throughout DSCA was modified to clarify that all site
work must be conducted by environmental contractors hired by
the DSCA Program.
Temporary Rule-making Authority
S.B. 1362 gave authority to the Environmental Management Commission
to adopt temporary risk-based rules in the event that ten or
more letters of objection to the permanent rules are received
by the Rules Review Commission.
Fall Board & Committee
Meetings
After driving through a blinding gulley washer
on Friday afternoon board and committee members from across the
state turned left at the thundering Waterfall that marks the
entrance to Highland Lake Inn's property and followed the winding
road through the pristine forest up the mountainside to the historic
lodge for the fall meeting of the NCALC Board and Committees.
The Lodge built in the 1920's has been tastefully up fitted with
all the modern conveniences of a first class hotel yet retains
all the charm of its historic origin. The great room which occupies
the center of the first floor features a stone fireplace, scattered
groupings of overstuffed couches, large screen TV and a corner
bar, served as a gathering place for getting to know you conversations,
football watching, and a short nap or two throughout the weekend.
The food at Highland Lake's award winning restaurant was outstanding
as attendee's feasted on Prime Rib, Cajun Catfish, Coq au Vin,
Duck Leg Confit and Wild Rice Salad, French Style Crab Cakes,
Beef Wellington, Fresh Vegetables from the organic gardens, fresh
home made breads and deserts in the evenings and wonderful breakfast
buffets featuring tempting egg scrambled, quiche and sweet potato
pancakes. Recreational opportunities abounded on property and
in the local area. [The rain had stopped by the time we arrived
and Saturday was a glorious day]. The lodge has a wonderful game
room on the lower level with pool, ping-pong, darts, foosball,
and another large screen TV which was enjoyed by the children
of all ages in attendance. Downtown Hendersonville where many
of us ventured after the Saturday morning meetings was really
a treat. Main Street is lined with neat restaurants, many with
sidewalk seating, and a plethora of unique shops concentrated
in a six block area.
Special Guest at this meeting
included Jeff Miller, winner of DLI 2007 Diamond Achievement
Award for his work in starting and propagating the Honor Air
Project to take WWII veterans to Washington, D.C. to visit the
WWII Memorial. Jeff was unable to attend CLEAN 07 in Vegas to
receive his award in person because he was in D.C. escorting
another group of veterans at the Memorial so we had the pleasure
of his company and the opportunity to thank him personally for
the great work he is doing. Two other NC drycleaners are carrying
on his work in their home counties. Bayard Crumpton, NuWay Cleaners
in Roxboro chaired his Rotary Club's project in Person County
which took seven buses to the Memorial and Marvin Thomas; Swannanoa
Cleaners is currently mounting a similar project with his Rotary
Club in Asheville (Buncombe County).
Another
special guest Tom Gosselin and his wife Maureen who joined us
for the weekend were not guest for long. The Gosselin's recently
retired to their home in Burnsville after selling their Laundry
and Drycleaning business in New Hampshire. Tom, a long time active
member of the North East Fabricare Association and DLI has served
on the Board of NEFA for many years and as their president and
was the DLI Director from Dist 1 when he sold his business. The
first action of the Board was to make Tom a Life Active Member
of NCALC after which President Gloria Cowell appointed him a
Director At Large and so he was a guest no more. WELCOME TOM
& MAUREEN to our family of friends and fellow cleaners.
In other action the Board approved
recommendations from the committees to:
· Authorize the Executive Director to renew the Association's
CD at Carolina Bank November 16, 2007
· Approved the wording for the brick to be placed in Legacy
Lane at DLI in honor of Ted Williams:
"TED WILLIAMS, INNOVATIVE AND
DEDICATED LEADER TO NCALC'
· Approved the Guidelines for the Mentorship Program
· Approved the wording of the Letters of Acknowledgement
and Notification for donations to the NCALC Scholarship Fund
· Approved acceptance of the proposal from the Atlantic
Beach Sheraton as the site for CAROLINA CLEAN 09 & 10
· Approved the recommendation of the DLI Board of Directors
for a 2.8% inflationary dues increase to take affect with April
08 renewals.
The
Board also accepted reports from the committees on their on going
work in their areas of responsibility.
The Governmental Committee reported
that:
· The Amendments to the Dry-cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act
were passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor August
31, 2007
· Final approval of the Risk Based Cleanup Rules by the
Rules Review Commission is expected on September 20, 2007.
· NCALC has submitted our final comments on the Risk Based
Cleanup Rules Guidance, prepared by Sam Taylor and Dr. Leslie
Hay Wilson, to the DSCA staff and we are waiting for their response.
Our concerns are mostly technical in nature.
· Although pledges and payments to Legislative/Regulatory
Fund have been substantial so far this year we are still $3,000
short of our goal of $30,000 in pledges and $8000.00 short in
payments. It was also noted that over 50% of the funds received
have come from Board & Committee members.
The Member Services Committee
reported that:
· Sandra Haralson, CED and DLI certified trainer will
be conducting an AOE approved drycleaning finishing class at
Medlin-Davis Cleaners in Apex, October 13, 2007
· Chris Allsbrooks, DLI Garment Analyst and Instructor
will be conducting four Customer Service & Problem Garment
Seminars in Greenville, Charlotte, Asheville and Raleigh October
21-24, 2007.
· Cathy Richardson AOE subcommittee chair will be sending
an AOE Satisfaction & Suggestion Survey to N.C. AOE cleaners
to obtain feedback for input to DLI on program improvement.
The
Membership Committee reported that:
· 14 New Members have joined NCALC since December 2006.
Nine were recruited by NCLAC putting us second only to seven-state
regional North East Fabricare Association with 20. Drycleaners
and Allied Trades are encouraged to keep up their efforts to
encourage non-members to join.
· Overall our membership has dropped by three since June
due to members not renewing on time. Hopefully, this is due to
the slower summer business, and they will renew as business picks
up in the fall.
· The New Member Rewards Program which is worth more than
annual dues to a new member in any dues category is still in
effect. This is in addition to the almost $2000.00 in average
savings members receive from utilizing DLI & NCALC endorsed
credit card processing and bad check collection services and
business insurance program.
The Trusteeship Committee reported
that:
· Their review of the Associations Financial Statements
and condition found everything to be in order.
· They will be recruiting retired and active drycleaners
to serve as mentors. Anyone interested in serving as a member
should contact Martin Young, Young Cleaners, Concord at 704-786-3011.
DLI Board Changes
2007-2008 Executive Committee
President
Barbara Harvey
Fabricare by Fran
Severna Park, Maryland
Chairman
H. Steven Poulos
Blair's Cleaners/ Elmest Inc.
North Canton, Ohio
President-Elect
Peter Valessares
M.K. Cleaners
Chicago, Illinois
Treasurer
Ed Robinson
Ed Robinson Laundry/Dry Cleaning
Columbia,
South Carolina
New Directors
District 1
Andrew Tirpok
Tirpok Cleaners
Flemington, New Jersey
District 5
Rick Kasperbauer
Kasperbauer Cleaners
Carroll, Iowa
International
Malcolm MacGregor
Browns Cleaners
Ottawa, Ontario
Allied Trades
Joven Lactaoen
Joven's Sales and Service
Los Angeles, California
Ignore Social Security "No-Match"
Letters at Your Peril!
Employers may receive a letter from the Social Security Administration
("SSA"), notifying them that specified employees' names
and social security numbers do not match SSA's records. Employers
have sometimes reacted to a "no-match" letter by terminating
the employees named in it. This is not a prudent response, as
the letter itself is not proof of illegal status, and termination
of employment without investigation of the reason for the discrepancy
may lead to a claim of national origin discrimination. At the
opposite end of the spectrum, some employers simply ignored the
letters. This is also not a prudent response, particularly now
that the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") has
clarified its stance on employer actions in response to no-match
letters.
For years, some confusion has
existed about exactly what is required of employers in regards
to I-9 forms and no-match letters. Recently, the federal government
implemented new regulations which state that an employer who
ignores a no-match letter can be found to have constructive knowledge
that it is employing an unauthorized worker. Knowingly employing
an unauthorized worker can lead to a civil fine of as much as
$2,000 per unauthorized worker for a first offense. DHS is proposing
to increase these penalties by 25%. In addition, DHS has the
ability to seek criminal penalties against employers who knowingly
employ unauthorized workers.
However, within a couple of weeks
of passing the new legislation, a federal district court in California
issued a temporary restraining order against DHS and SSA which
prohibits those agencies from implementing these new regulations.
Thus, the new rules, including the safe harbor provision discussed
below, are not in effect yet, but will be if the temporary restraining
order is dissolved, and prudent employers should know what impact
the law will have if and when it takes effect. Employers should
also understand that the procedures outlined within the new legislation
will help protect them, regardless of the status of the law.
The new regulations set out specific
procedures that employers can follow to take advantage of a "safe
harbor" against being found to have constructive knowledge
of a worker's unauthorized status arising from the receipt of
a no-match letter or a communication from DHS questioning the
validity of immigration documents examined during the course
of an I-9 audit. (Of course, if the employer has actual knowledge
of a worker's unauthorized status, the safe harbor may not provide
protection.) The various steps of the safe harbor procedure must
be completed within specified time frames, lasting no longer
than 93 days from the employer's receipt of the no-match letter.
Within thirty days of receipt
of the letter, the employer should check his records to confirm
whether or not there was a clerical error. If there was a clerical
error, he or she should inform SSA of the corrected information
and verify and document that the discrepancy has been resolved.
If the mismatch was not a clerical error, the employer should
request the employee confirm the accuracy of his or her social
security number and then provide the correct information to SSA.
If the employee states that the number listed is correct, the
employer should have the employee contact SSA within 90 days
of the no-match letter to resolve it. If the matter is not resolved
within 90 days of the no-match letter, the employer should complete
a new I-9 for the employee, and be careful not to accept documents
that contain the same social security number at issue. The employee
must also present photograph identification as provided in the
I-9, and the employee should complete new tax return documents
with the new information. All documents, including both of the
employee's I-9 forms, should be held in a file by the employer.
If the employee cannot complete a new I-9, he or she should be
terminated. By following these procedures, the employer should
avail himself of the safe harbor protection.
Prior to even receiving a no-match
letter, prudent employers should establish procedures, like those
discussed above, for dealing with a no-match letter. DHS says
that it will consider the totality of relevant circumstances
in determining the employer's "constructive knowledge"
of illegal employment, but following the new regulations should
help protect against DHS fines and penalties. Furthermore, employers
should be reminded that no-match letters are only issued when
SSA finds more than ten mismatched social security numbers. It
is unlikely that small employers will ever receive the mismatch
letters, yet they remain responsible for taking the appropriate
steps to verify employment eligibility as outlined in the I-9.
Careful and consistently applied procedures should help prevent
claims of national origin discrimination while also protecting
employers from liability for illegal workers.
Julie Hampton is a litigation
attorney in the Raleigh office of Poyner & Spruill LLP.
Portions of this article came
from a publication authored by Susie Gibbons, an employment law
attorney in the Raleigh office of Poyner & Spruill LLP, and
can be found in their entirety at www.poynerspruill.com.
Ways NCALC Has Saved You Money
· Dry-cleaning Solvent cleanup Act of 1997 limited your
liability for the cleanup of a contaminated site to a maximum
of
$39,000 for an abandoned site
$29,000 for active site with > 10 FTE'S *
$21,000 for active site with 5 - 10 FTE's
$13,000 for active site with < 5 FTE's
for a clean-up that cost $1 Million or More.
· Amendments to the Dry-cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act in
2000 removed the requirement that every plant site maintain in-force
a one million dollar contamination liability insurance policy.
An annual savings of $1500 to $2500.
· Removal of the Sales
Tax on fuel oil and propane used in the direct production of
drycleaning and laundry (i.e. to fire the boiler), laundry and
dry-cleaning machinery, parts and accessories (i.e. filter cartridges,
pads & covers) attached to the machinery and lubricants applied
to the machinery. THE ALTERNATIVE WOULD HAVE BEEN 61/2 TO 7%
SALES TAX WITH NO MAXIMUM. Your savings, if you buy a $35,000
piece of equipment is $2275 to $2450.
· Amendments to the Dry-cleaning
Solvent Cleanup Act in 2007 replaced the $5,000, $10,000, $15,000
or $25,000 up front cost (i.e. deductibles) and replaced them
with a $1000 registration fee and co-pay formula which reduced
a petitioner's front end and maximum liability for clean-up cost,
to a maximum of:
$21,000 for active site with > 10 FTE'S *
$16,000 for active site with 5 - 10 FTE's
$11,000 for active site with < 5 FTE's
$16,000 for an inactive site
** FTE - Full Time Employee Equivalents
Solvent
Options
Cleaners Share Their Experiences
at Clean '07
PETROLEUM SOLVENT
Gary Dawson
Belleair Bluffs Cleaners, Belleair Bluffs, Florida
Pros
Equipment
· No special equipment was needed to process petroleum
based cleaning.
Regulations
· Quite honestly with petroleum based solvents having
minimal regulations it was apparent that this was the direction
for us to go.
Processing/Operations
· Petroleum solvent seems to be easier on the fabrics
that we clean especially items with sequins, plastics, and elastics.
We also noticed that aluminum zippers and invisible zippers are
not the problem they used to be.
· No special supplies were required
· No needed changes in pressing procedures or equipment.
Marketing
· We have made no marketing changes. I'm a drycleaner
and I'm out to do a quality job no matter what solvent I use
and do it responsibly.
Cons
Equipment
· The cost of the equipment is 50-60 % higher than an
equivalent perc system.
Processing/Operations
· Running times are longer. We are averaging 65-70 minutes
per load to do a proper cleaning job. We find that we need to
start earlier in the morning and end later in the day to get
the poundage out.
· In stain removal we can no longer put damp items in
for cleaning and can also no longer leave any chemical residue
(POG, Amyl Acetate, etc.) on garments to be cleaned as these
products can contribute to odors in the solvent. Everything needs
to be flushed and dried before cleaning.
· There is more maintenance on a machine with petroleum
based products than with perc. Things such as water separators
need to be cleaned weekly as well as cleaning the base tanks
once or twice a year basis to prevent bacteria from building
up contaminating the solvent. Once that happens you will need
to replace the solvent in the entire system and clean the base
tanks and separators to remove the odor.
PERCHLOROETHYLENE
Chris Edwards
A Cleaner World, High Point, NC
Pros
Equipment
· We continue to use perc because we believe that with
today's equipment, and with proper operator training we can still
do what is best for our customer's garments while at the same
time protecting from a release to the environment.
Processing/Operations
· We have been using perc since our company was founded
in 1969. It is the best overall solvent we have found for cleaning
clothes.
· We have experimented
with one Green Earth machine and two DF 2000 machines in the
past, but are 100% perc at this time. We plan to continue to
use perc for the foreseeable future, but we are open to some
interesting processes that are just appearing on the horizon.
Cons
Regulations
· We realize there are disadvantages such as environmental
concerns.
Processing/Operations
· There can be problems with buttons and trim, and in
some cases it is quite strong for certain garments. We also supplement
our cleaning with professional wet cleaning equipment.
CO2
Tom Ustanik
Lansing Cleaners, Lansing, IL
Pros
Equipment
· For conventional loads 55 pounds 40 minutes.
· For fire loads 50 pounds 51 minutes.
· Even though the machines have a high starting cost,
they're engineered for a considerably longer life.
· We did not need to purchase any special equipment that
may not have been necessary for any another drycleaning machine
other than a fill vessel for the CO2.
Processing/Operations
· Gentle on garments, little or no dye loss, little pilling
or crocking, no heat related shrinkage issues and the ability
to clean leathers, most trims, and furs without any of the hazards
of heat needed for drying. Additionally, silks due to the no
heat drying and detergent allow additional brighteners to be
left behind and without removing the natural oils from the materials.
The hand and appearance of soft wools is superior to most other
cleaning systems.
· The ability to run full loads that gives us higher production.
· Pressing with CO2 is simpler than other systems since
there is no heat required for dying eliminating shrinkage and
basket wrinkles. The garments come out slightly dehydrated and
cold. They pick up moisture and warm up at room temperature.
With CO2, we are able to process as much as 25% of the volume
through a steam tunnel with little or no touchup.
· We had to purchase the necessary supplies, such as detergents
and pre-spotters that are used for CO2 cleaning systems.
· Initially it was suggested that we do more pre-spotting.
We eliminated most pre-spotting and proceeded to do only post-spotting.
We have found since there is no heat used for tumble drying most
of the remaining stains are removed with steam. This reduces
the use of chemicals in stain removal and less time spent removing
stains.
· We are able to run full 50 pound loads every time in
the machine. Production on a per day basis is considerably faster
than it was previously with perc, where we had to separate loads
for bleeders, lights, darks, lightweights, heavyweights, and
drying issues. With CO2, none of those issues exist.
· The actual pressing time has, on average, declined due
to the fact of no heat.
· The CO2 is less harsh and allows the garments to maintain
a better hand which helps increase pressing pieces per hour.
Regulations
· As a larger cleaning operation and being involved heavily
with state regulators in regards to other programs outside of
the drycleaning industry we felt that a large operations such
as ours would be primary targets for further regulations. CO2
has none of the issues that perc has with ground contamination,
airborne's and vapor intrusion.
· Also with the elimination of contamination issues especially
in a green field site, could virtually eliminate the possibility
of any further contamination issues for that operation.
Marketing
· We market CO2 primarily for our fire restoration services
which has been a considerable benefit to our operation. We do
not hear complaints that we used too harsh of a chemical, or
that they are allergic.
· The fact we use a low temperature for the most part
eliminates most shrinkage issues is another point we can use
for marketing.
· We also clean garment for clients that have chemical
allergies upon request.
· We've used it for mold remediation with considerable
success and positive documentation.
· Using CO2 has allowed us to continue to grow our restoration
business.
· It has helped us win three Governor's Pollution Prevention
awards, be a tour member for the National Pollution Prevention
Roundtable convention and has allowed us to be meet a large number
of Federal, State and even Canadian environmental and pollution
prevention officers.
· All of the above have given us positive newspaper coverage,
which would not have been possible in any other manner.
Cons
Equipment
· Initial cost of the machine was considerably more expensive
than a typical drycleaning machine although the price of the
machines today has come down from the original.
Processing/Operations
· Due to the fact that it is under pressure water does
not function the same as in other cleaning systems. This does
not allow for the full removal of water-based stains. The stains
that do come to the surface are considerably easier to remove
due to the lack of heat in drying and the fact that they re brought
direct to the surface of the fibers. They still have to be contended
with even though that is not a drastic problem it is one that
we have to deal with. The same factors that make CO2 a very gentle
cleaning solvent does lack solvent weight and solvent weight
is a precursor to particulate removal.
· It can't be used effectively on every garment. Some
examples of items that can not be cleaned in CO2 are triacetate,
some acetates, and garments with glued on beads that have hollow
centers and no hole where as solid beads with a hole are not
affected.
· Built up latex appliqués and lettering absorb
CO2 and bubble up. Some may restore themselves after degassing
but others do not. It is difficult to determine which ones will
or will not fail.
GREENEARTH
Fran Sadler
Medlin Davis Cleaners, Raleigh, North Carolina
Pros
Equipment
· No changes in pressing procedures or equipment was needed.
· There is no increase in the routine daily maintenance,
such as cleaning the lint and button traps.
Processing/Operations
· GreenEarth has delivered a greater sense of confidence
to our employees and customers because of its ability to clean
garments embellished with trims, without hesitation.
· Price per gallon is $17.00.
· Because of the low surface tension GreenEarth is very
gentle on the garments, which keeps them looking like-new longer.
· Darks are rich and deep in color as if they have been
through a mineral oil bath.
· There is virtually no odor, very little "free"
lint, and the clothes have an extremely soft hand.
· We did increase our wetcleaning capabilities, but I
strongly believe we would have done the same if we were using
any solvent.
· There are excellent paint, oil, and grease removers
and levelers that are compatible with GreenEarth. The special
compatible wet-side stain removal agents manufactured can be
applied to the stain and immediately cleaned.
· We have found the traditional tannin and protein formulas
to be more affective on those types of wet-side stains, such
as coffee or blood. Just as you would with perc, you must flush
them with steam and the fabric must be dry before re-cleaning.
· The finishing may actually be slightly easier and faster
due to the very soft hand.
Regulations
· We chose GreenEarth because of our concern for being
environmentally responsible, by reducing hazardous waste and
risk to the employees and the environment.
· Our decision to change to GreenEarth was based on many
factors; leasing verses owning, existing contamination issues,
our inability to renew leases due to the landlord's preferences,
and our state clean-up fund.
· At our main location, switching to GreenEarth was the
landlord's stipulation.
· At the other two GreenEarth plants, where we own the
real-estate, liability, risk to future generations, and future
marketability to buyers of the business was still the deciding
factor.
· In North Carolina, landlord issues from REIT's and national
shopping center developers are the primary force in solvent selection.
· A reduction in hazardous waste expenses may be realized
based on your state's regulations.
Marketing
· We have experienced an opportunity to capture the environmentally
conscientious client. Our advertising efforts have benefited
from emphasizing environmental awareness.
· The market for wedding gowns and high-end specialty
items has delivered an overall increase in all garment types.
Cons
Equipment
· Due to longer running times we needed to double our
poundage capacity in order to produce the same volume in the
same amount of time. The capital investment for a 40 lb. machine
is about ·55,000, a 60lb. machine is about ·65,000.
· As a consequence of buying a larger capacity machine
we needed to increase the size of our chillers, which necessitated
an electrical up-grade as well.
Processing/Operations
· Because GreenEarth and water weigh about the same, there
is a greater sensitivity to odor problems, which may allow bacteria
grow. Consequently we have found our operator's must be very
diligent. The water separators must be cleaned weekly. Twice
a year our maintenance department cleans out the base tanks,
the steam coils, and the condensing coils.
· The only difference with GreenEarth spotting is wet-dry
products, such as Wetspo, Semi-wet, 2 in 1 formula, etc., cannot
be used unless they are flushed from the fabric. With perc those
products do not need to be flushed.
· Our stain removal technicians have become more conscientious
about pre-spotting and experts at post-spotting given that re-cleaning
is time consuming and upsets the lot control.
· In some cases we have had an occasional angora sweater
or very soft wool shrink either because of the longer cleaning
times/mechanical action or the required high drying temperature.
· There is an occasional dye-bleed or dry transfer. Even
though this type of damage is a tiny fraction of the damage associated
with perc you should separate lights from darks.
· Cleaning and drying is 70 - 80 minutes for a regular
load.
· Some items will not dry if they are in a net bag.
· There is an increase in stain removal.
Joe Iannarelli
Fi-Del Inc., Bridgeville, Pennsylvania
Pros
Equipment
· No special equipment is needed to use DrySolv. We only
had to make some minor changes to our perc machine. We reduced
the steam pressure in the still to 10 psi and turned down the
drying temperatures to 110ºF.
· We started with one test machine. Since we had such
a positive experience with the first we changed the solvent in
our other two machines.
Processing/Operations
· Cleaning is simple and fast with good results.
· The average time to clean and dry a load is 25 to 32
minutes.
· We have been able increase production by up to 2-3 pieces
per operator hour by using DrySolv.
· We are able to run with one base tank because DrySolv
distills faster than perc so the still is able to keep up with
the shorter cleaning cycles.
· The clothes are dried at 110ºF leaving fewer wrinkles
requiring less steam, vacuum, and time in pressing.
· Stain removal is very similar to what we were doing
before with less prespotting on the dry side.
· We have found a cationic detergent gives us the best
results.
· Production takes less time with DrySolv, both cleaning
and finishing.
· We have had no special machine maintenance issues.
· The price of the solvent has been off set by lower utilities
due to lower drying and distillation temperatures as well as
labor.
Regulations
· Reason we changed was due to environmental issues with
perc. We also wanted to insure that there would be no problems
related to contamination should we want to seek further financing
from an institution.
· We checked with a other sources and also conferred with
the Department of Environmental Protection who had no issues
with DrySolv.
Marketing
· You can market a product that is a friend to the environment.
Customers seem to like that very much.
Cons
· The price is $40 a gallon.
Although I use every solvent being discussed on the panel, Perc,
PureDry, CO2, Solvair, and Green Earth the common thread throughout
all my operations is wet-cleaning.
Pros
Equipment
· We began using tensioning equipment almost immediately
after beginning wet-cleaning, and I would never go back to traditional
presses. An important change for our pressers was getting used
to pressing garments which were still damp. We had to figure
out the correct finishing agent which gave us the best look and
feel in the least amount of time.
Processing/Operations
· We are in our 9th year using the Miele wet-cleaning
system. While we have had one plant run strictly wet-cleaning
for a period of time, we now universally use wet-cleaning as
an adjunct to solvent cleaning. The mix varies according to the
region of the country and the season. In general the percentages
range from 30% - 60%.
· The most favorable reasons for wet-cleaning are the
quality of the finished product. Beautiful whites, cottons, linens,
silks with no graying or yellowing and no odors. With automation
comes consistency without guesswork. Since baths are mostly on
the wet-side anyway, moving to a wet-cleaning program afterwards
is so easy we find we do much more soaking and bleaching, which
in turn increases stain removal and customer satisfaction.
· Because most spotting takes place on the wet-side, wet-cleaning
has made our spotting much easier. We do not wait to dry garments
for re-dry-cleaning. We simply put them in the next wet-cleaning
load according to program selection.
Marketing
· We heavily marketed wet-cleaning when we first introduced
it using brochures, hang-tags, and customer service training.
But now we just mention it in all our printing and ad copy along
with our other services as an alternative to traditional solvent.
Cons
Processing/Operations
· Our experiment running 100% wet-cleaning convinced us
that while it was a valuable experience which forced us to learn
about reading labels and proper classification, it was too great
a departure from what we were comfortable with in a high volume
operation. Were we a smaller shop, I'm sure it would have been
a viable option for us to go 100%.
· The least favorable reasons for wet-cleaning vary from
the occasional human error resulting in a problem to the ongoing
splitting of lots and orders. Testing for colors is a must if
you want to avoid bleeding and employees sometimes over dry garments
resulting in shrinkage.
· While the average cycle time is just 21 minutes for
wet-cleaning and 40 minutes for washing, the breakdown necessary
for proper classification means that garments are ready for pressing
at many different times. If a plant uses just 3 basic programs
for example 1 for silks, 1 for wools, and 1 for cottons / khakis,
with the separation for lights and darks, that means 6 different
loads. A great deal of discipline is required to keep work flowing
together.
· Dry-side stains can be a problem. While most chemical
companies have dry-side spotting agents for wet-cleaning, some
stains prove to be too imbedded and must be dry-cleaned.
|